Viral warts, also known as verrucas on the feet, are common but can be bothersome. Many dislike their appearance and they can be painful if located over pressure points like joints. While about 70% of warts disappear naturally within two years without treatment, there are several methods to potentially speed up this process.

Treatment Options:

– Over-the-Counter Remedies: Salicylic acid or lactic acid treatments available at pharmacies can be effective. Use these as directed for at least two months.

– Freezing (Cryotherapy): This treatment involves applying liquid nitrogen and is available at many health centres. It can be painful and studies show it’s no more effective than salicylic acid treatments.

Duct Tape Method:

A surprising but effective method is using duct tape:

What is Duct Tape?

A strong, waterproof tape used in construction, available at most DIY stores.

How to Use:

  1. Apply: Cut a piece of duct tape to fit the wart’s size. Stick it on the wart and leave for six days. Replace if it falls off.

  2. Remove and Treat: After six days, remove the tape, soak the wart in warm water, and gently remove dead skin with an emery board or pumice stone.

  3. Repeat: Leave the tape off overnight. Reapply the next morning and continue the six days on, one day off cycle for up to two months, or until the wart disappears.

 What to Expect:

– In studies, 85% of people using duct tape cleared their warts within two months, compared to 60% with freezing.

– Side Effects: Some might experience skin irritation from the tape’s glue. If the wart area becomes sore or painful, especially after filing, be gentler next time. If irritation or pain persists, consult a doctor.

Summary:

Duct tape is a cost-effective and simple home remedy for treating most viral warts. Follow the instructions carefully and be patient with the process for the best results.

Reference: Focht D R, Spicer C, Farchok, M P. The efficacy of duct tape versus cryotherapy in the treatment of verruca vulgaris (the common wart). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156: 971-4*